When Personal Branding and Corporate Image Collide

keyboard-coffee-writing

Personal vs Corporate Branding CollisionWhat is your “personal brand”? This is an area of growing concern in today’s times as more and more people participate and engage in social networking. Before the Internet revolution, the term “brand” was only used in the context of the business world.

The word “brand” brings to mind many variations of the same concept, such as: “trade name,” “trademark,” and “a name, sign, symbol or slogan.” Essentially, a brand from a corporate perspective is the embodiment of anything and everything that the company says, does, doesn’t say, doesn’t do, how they say it, what others say about them, how others perceive them, etc. The phrase “you are your brand” most effectively exemplifies this concept.

Fast forward to 2010 and this age of transparency to look at the term “brand” in the perspective in which it is used today. This is where the concept of “personal branding” plays a crucial role. Social media networking has enabled everyone to have their own personal brand by way of publicly sharing anything and everything that they “say” on the World Wide Web. If you cut through all of the semantics and take this concept of personal branding down to the most basic level, what you are left with is simply what is commonly referred to as your “reputation.” Your personal brand is your reputation.

What happens in this advanced age of technology and social media marketing to a company’s brand reputation when their employees have their own personal brand? This topic was discussed and debated at great length in Fortune Magazine’s article Building your brand (and keeping your job) by Josh Hyatt. Josh spoke about Scott Monty, Ford’s first global digital and multimedia communications manager and his use of social media to promote his own personal brand and Ford’s corporate brand. In summary, Scott was a social media guru with a high degree of credibility and 3,500 Twitter followers prior to accepting a position with Ford and had already earned his personal brand reputation. Scott used his social influence to further the goals of Ford and enhance their brand synergistically with his own brand. A perfect match!

What ensued after this article was published was an incredible amount of criticism about the way the author portrayed Scott Monty which is really not relevant to the topic of this post. This author sees the mutually-beneficial business relationship between Scott and Ford as an example of how to handle our new age of business that we find ourselves in today. It works for Scott and it works for Ford making this a win-win proposition.

However, more often than not, employees don’t capitalize on their personal brand to enhance the image of the company they work for. This is not to say that they wouldn’t want to help out their company, but rather to imply that many people use social media for their own personal use that has nothing to do with where they work. Yet companies are concerned with how their brand may be affected by an employee’s use of social media. Some companies prohibit their employees from using social networking sites in an effort to avert any damage that might be done to their corporate brand.

The solution to this potential problem is quite simple. If people would understand the impact their written word has and use good judgment in what they post, there would be no problem. Fortune Magazine also featured a case study called Edit Thyself, a very befitting title. The study discusses a young woman who was just “letting out some frustration” when she Tweeted something about her boss that got her fired. Moral of this story: Don’t let out your frustration in PUBLIC because EVERYONE will see it. Call a friend instead which is exactly what this young woman learned from her experience.

The bottom line here is, when using social media, remember that anything and everything you write can and will be read by anyone and everyone. Yes, some of the social networking sites like Facebook have privacy controls set-up, however, these controls change often and it is highly possible that you might forget to control these settings for even one comment that might not sit well with someone in your life – and that someone could be your boss.

It is really a matter of common sense. The problem is that, unfortunately, not everyone uses common sense either because they don’t have any or because they are busy doing a million things at once and they forget to think. This puts companies in the position of having to be concerned about their employees’ personal branding. Do they have a right to censor their employees’ personal branding? The answer to that is not clear, but until common sense becomes commonplace, companies do have something to be concerned about.

Author

  • Julie Weishaar

    Julie Weishaar has 10+ years of experience in strategic marketing initiatives, marketing communications, event planning, marketing management, business development, customer service, vendor and public relations, managing promotional campaigns, branding and, more recently, in Internet marketing programs including natural search optimization, link building, blogging, business analytics, social networking, and article marketing.To learn more about Julie's expertise, please visit her website at newhorizons123.com.

    View all posts

3 Responses

  1. Angie Perez says:

    Julie, do you remember a while back when two Dominos or Burger King employees filmed themselves taking a bath in a kitchen sink on company property? If you look on YouTube, the video is probably still online. Imagine same situation except this time the employees film themselves in their own home.

    The affect is not as sensational as the first filming. Yet, would Dominos or BK would have care what their employees do on their own personal time (assuming it's not breaking the law-a underage person filming him/herself bathing could be considered child pornography)?

    In any event, you ask a very key question that all employees should be mindful of: Does my employer have the right to censor my personal brand? Does my employer have the right to censor who I am outside of work? I say yes, when you are in a position to influence the company’s brand (specifically when one’s twitter or Facebook profile references work) and NO when a person uses the same media outlets to connect with friends and family (with no mention of work).  
     
    Generally when athletes sign a big endorsement deal, they are required to sign a contract with a Moral Values clause, which the company outlines scenarios in which there may be cause to dump an athlete when said athlete becomes involved in some type of scandal or simply violates the morals of the company.
     
    I can’t remember if I ever had to sign a contract of employment with said clause. I do know that a number of HR departments are scrambling to get a social networking policy in place so that they can protect themselves against employees in a position to influence a company’s brand position.
     
    Interesting article. 

     
     
     
     
       

  2. Hi Angie,,
    No I don't remember that commercial. You are right – it is definitely an important question with no clear cut answer. Even in the situation you describe where one uses social media outlets only for personal use, if that person has an influence on a company's brand, even if they don't mention the company in their social networking, what they do and say on the web has a direct effect on their reputation/personal brand. If they write about controversial topics, or anything that someone might find offensive, even if it has nothing to do with the business, they might be seen personally in a negative light by some and this could potentially negatively affect the company they work for.

    It is a real tough call. When an athlete signs an endorsement deal – they are essentially signing over ALL of themselves – including their personal lives, so that moral values clause makes sense.
     
    It will be interesting to see how all this unfolds as more and more HR departments develop social networking policies.
    Thanks for your insightful comments 🙂

  3. Maya Libretti says:

    Julie, the questtion: “Does my employer have the right to censor my personal brand?” is much more interesting and fruitful if reframed. Why take a censorship approach? Companies are optimized when their people are optimized, pulling together in the same direction with exhuberance or passion. The business model of master/overseer vs slave/peon does unfortunately still exist, but doesn’t a company coaching or helping an employee optimize their personal brand make better sense? I’ve seen people in jobs that are held back, squelched, kept from contributing their gifts to the common effort. Or people who would shine and bring something awesome to the table if their talents had some encouragement or coaching, the kind that is in *alignment* with who they are, not who the Machine wants them to be. I find a lot of personal branding talk to be a lot of doublespeak actually. On one hand it’s about authenticity, and on the other hand it’s about donning a girdle and conforming, which has the very bad side effect of elevating fear. Fear does motivate people, but it also creates a volatile and unsustainable business milieu. I prefer the concepts of mutual benefit and sharing. There is no reason that an engineering firm, say, would “lose” from helping an employee develop a personal brand as a cyclist, musician, seamstress, chef, etc. I work in architecture and one of my colleagues is quite a famous amateur baker locally! So what? Does it bring in clients exactly? Probably not. But it makes us human and interesting, and in this Machine saturated world, there’s something nice and comforting about people who are people, and not plastic conformatons.